Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="cI6OQgnE";
	dkim-atps=neutral
From: Rob Pike <robpike@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 23:08:39 +1000
To: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] fmt(1): history, POSIX, -t, -c
Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org
Sender: "TUHS" <tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org>

I looked in my manuals. Fmt(1) first appears in Research 9th edition. I
have vague memories that it was written by Tom Duff, but a) I could
misremember and b) I also have vague memories it was not original. If both
memories are accurate, it's just a simple command written in two different
places, one being a distorted echo of another. Much like the make td wrote
at UofT after hearing about Stu's.

Nothing nefarious.

-rob


On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:41 PM markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de> wrote:

> Hoi,
>
> personally I use fmt(1) a lot for email formatting and such.
> Typically I only use the `-w' parameter. Now someone asked me about
> `-t' and `-c' of *GNU* fmt(1). I wasn't able to find good documentation
> on them. The manpage only tells that they have to do with different
> indentation for the first or first two lines. But what are the use
> cases? How would source text for these parameters look like?
>
> A look into the description and rationale sections of POSIX, which
> often provides helpful information, was not possible because fmt(1)
> is not part of POSIX (only fold(1) is). Why's that? Is it because
> fmt(1) differs so much between Unix implementations? On BSD `-c'
> centers text and `-t' sets tab widths. Plan 9 has none of these
> options. But still, `-w' could have been standardized. Or was the
> line filling algorithm different as well? How does fold(1) fit into
> the picture?
>
> Maybe you can answer some of these questions or give hints on where
> I could find answers myself.
>
>
> meillo
>