━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ PRAXIS MEETING #1 Edward Wilson ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Table of Contents ───────────────── 1. Info 2. Marking Boycott 3. SU/NUS reaffiliation 4. Action decisions 5. Admin decisions 6. Postscript 1 Info ══════ Time: 3pm-4:20pm Date: 15.5.22 (Sunday) Location: Library floor 2, group study room. Attendees: 5 2 Marking Boycott ═════════════════ UCU are going ahead with the marking boycott. Vote happened around the 6th of may(?), boycott scheduled to start on the 23rd of May (8 days from now). *What is likely to happen*: The boycott goes ahead on the 23rd -> University has made a plan -> The University outsources marking. *But there are more possibilities*: 1. If the boycott does go ahead on the 23rd (most likely). 1. University ’does nothing’, boycott goes ahead. Graduation (crucially in its administrative capacity) would be disrupted. University would get in trouble with rankings/Ofsted and some students maybe legally, things it cares a lot about. 2. University makes/has made a plan to combat the effects of the boycott (most likely). 1. The University outsources marking, either inter-department (depends on departments, would be harder with, say, SPAH vs. Law). Or to an agency. 2. The University forecasts/predicts grades using some kind of algorithm. 2. The boycott does not go ahead on the 23rd (least likely). 1. University concedes to all UCU demands attached to the boycott before the 23rd -> UCU calls off boycott. 2. The University concedes to some of UCU demands attached to the boycott before the 23rd (most likely) -> UCU calls off boycott. 3. The UCU calls off the boycott without winning any demands before the 23rd. *What should we do in these situations?* 1. If the boycott is called off as UCU has won some or all demands: Good! Demonstrates the effectiveness of the boycott and, moreover, UCU has won some demands. 2. If the boycott goes ahead and the University either outsources or algorithmises as a solution: Bad! Make the case to students that the university is fucking them over. Argue against both outsourcing and algorithms. *In the meantime*: 1. Create some kind of communique to clarify the situation for students (The SU hasn’t put out much info, neither has the University, neither has the UCU; we can be first) “The University doesn’t have a plan!”. Will include both up-to-date info and our position but also talks to students who aren’t totally on side. 2. Continue to think/strategise and bring thoughts to the next meeting. 3. Act as a ’touchstone’ between the students and the situation. Keep students informed even if they’re not on-side. Get ’middle’ students on side by clarifying the situation, pushing the political point of it being in students’ interests too. 3 SU/NUS reaffiliation ══════════════════════ K met with CEO of SU after the SU committee to reaffiliate. CEO (Craig Stephens) not happy to reaffiliate, said we can participate in national struggles w/o being part of the NUS. Usual arguments. Samira felt she lost b/c of support for strikes, we don’t agree. SU hasn’t technically got rid of its strike support motion, but basically a technicality. SU seems (as usual), lost cause. 4 Action decisions ══════════════════ 1. E: to create a ’communication’ to students outlining the possibilities with regard to the marking strike, as discussed in the session. (Agreed by attendees). 5 Admin decisions ═════════════════ 1. Next meeting schedules for next week, Sunday 22nd May at 3pm in the Library 2nd floor group study room. 2. Invite people who were at the meeting to the discord. 3. Agenda items for next week already submitted: 1. E: Marking Boycott cont’d (will be a day before its set to start). 2. K: Wyvern resurrection, place to put our statements and communications. 3. C: Production of leaflets with same point as the communication. 6 Postscript ════════════ Thanks so much to everyone who turned up, and hopefully see you next week.